Chiming in this week is Bill Conway--a world traveler, an acclaimed social studies teacher, and a colleague.
Recently, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has been touting his balanced budget and the surplus money he put into a rainy day fund. I have a hard time celebrating this news as our school district continues to face dire economic issues.
Recently, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has been touting his balanced budget and the surplus money he put into a rainy day fund. I have a hard time celebrating this news as our school district continues to face dire economic issues.
Have we
gone too far with these hatchet-style budget cuts? Have we passed a
tipping point? Wisconsin’s Superintendent asks more for schools that are in need, while
our Governor is promising to deliver less. Can we work with less? Can we
deliver what our communities and children deserve with what we are being given?
I had
an economics class in college, way back when. My professor used a waterbed
analogy that I am reminded of often. Granted, I went to UW-Madison in the
80’s and a waterbed analogy may be hard to explain to today’s youth, but I think
our adult readers will know what I mean. His point at the time was simple: Things
cost what they cost. If you push down in one area of the bed, it will
just force another area of the bed to rise. If, instead, you let out the water,
it will stop being a bed.
Gov.
Walker and his supporters are underfunding education (pushing down one side of
the waterbed) to balance the state budget. School districts are being
given less money by the state even as education costs rise. This is a
budget-balancing trick that really pushes the cost on to someone
else.
School
districts are making up the difference by raising taxes locally or going to referendums to raise the money. These
are school districts that want to continue to have a functioning school
district. Districts are also using federal grant money to temporarily fill
positions. Again, these are all waterbed techniques that only mask
the fact that the price has not changed, just the process of getting the funds.
Some
school districts have decided to allow the water out of the bed. They have
cut positions deemed unnecessary or redundant. They claim that teachers are
being paid too much and take away fromtheir salaries in the form of
benefits payments. Higher teacher-to-student ratios, increased scheduling, and larger
class loads are all being played with--not for the betterment of public
education--but to meet the new budget restrictions.
I have
hoped that Wisconsin school boards, seeing the damage being done to our public
education system, would speak up. Drunk with the possibilities of a
restriction-free mandate to push moral reforms, dress codes, more testing, teacher
accountability, and the firing of educators deemed old and lazy (read
experienced and expensive), district leaders have allowed these radical funding
changes to happen. Now they are left with the realization that their options
are not all that attractive.
You can
only let so much water out the waterbed before it stops being a bed.
No comments:
Post a Comment